Tuesday, December 22, 2009

PLEASE HAVE MY SEAT YOUR MAJESTY.

Can it be possible that the Queen has at last decided to change her ways and give the long suffering British Tax payer a break? There she was photographed boarding a train on her own. She was flunky less and there appeared to be normal people already on the train; considering that I have been critical in the past of her and her workshy family’s cavalier attitude to spending my money and yours; it is only fair that I congratulate her on seeing the error of her ways; well done Mam and I hope that this dose of reality is catching among your family.

Could it be possible that the royals have actually noticed that we are in a period of austerity; I doubt that but those who actually run the Royal circus have probably drawn it to her and her family’s attention; they are learning that they can’t nowadays tell the breadless hungry to “eat cake” I believe the train ride; first class of course cost in the region of £44 a massive saving on using the Royal Train or getting one of her self-indulgent grand sons to pop down and give her a lift on an RAF helicopter.

I wonder what ‘one’ chats to fellow passengers about on such a journey and do her fellow passengers act normal as they discuss the weather or the upkeep of several palaces perhaps or the delicate business of preventing ‘one’s’ gaff prone spouse from escaping his minders. Still it’s one step forward and two steps back as the Royals are now insisting that photographs can not be taken of them when they are relaxing or killing furry animals and wee birds which begs the question, what are they for if not to be photographed and gawked at? Still a train ride with the possibility of talking to one’s subjects is a start. Did she really pay for the ticket though?

The poor woman unfortunately can still rely on Charles or ‘luggy’ as he’s known to his chums to cause her grief; as we learn that he is writing personal letters to Govt. ministers telling them how to run their departments; as you do. He is clearly a concerned citizen and we must all assume that his opinions are given the same weight as all of ours right?

12 comments:

Ariel said...

That's the seat in the Lords b******d, Kelly!

Good to see HM travelling with the plebs. Did Uncle Joe, Fidel, Mugabe, Blair, Brown and the rest of the Men of the People ever dare get that close to the voters?

There is evidence that Winston did, but, like HM, he had guts.

Cllr Terry Kelly said...

(Ariel) 14:36
“There is evidence that Winston did”

If he ever did it would have been because he was too drunk to know where he was.

Ariel said...

Churchill or Stalin? Which would you choose to live under, Councillor?

Anonymous said...

Your comment about Churchill might be spot on. But, drunk or sober, Winston knew what a crock of bitter shit socialism is. Thank God, it's dying.

Cllr Terry Kelly said...

(Ariel) 22/12/09

Well Churchill was a congenital idiot and a serial drunk with almost no grasp of normality while Stalin did more than anyone to save the world from Nazism; so on reflection I would choose Stalin but; don’t waste your time describing what a beast he was to me; I don’t buy that propaganda.

Most of the British troops saw through the Churchill B*****t and delivered their verdict on him at the earliest opportunity; they knew only too well that Churchill would have taken Britain back to the rich man in his castle and the poor man at the gate; he was as much a class warrior as Karl Marx.

Cllr Terry Kelly said...

(Edgar) 22/12/09

It's the season to be jolly right enough Edgar. Winston knew very little he couldn’t find his own A**e using both hands.

Poor old Socialism eh. Do you live in a cave? Have you not noticed what has been going on in the wonderful world of Capitalism? Or are you in denial or just daft?

Ariel said...

Kelly would sooner live under Stalin...says it all really.

Councillor, that is the first time you have - ever - answered a question! I do hope you will live to regret it

Ryan Connolly said...

The wonderful world of socialism.

Where socialist Tony Blair has more wealth than 100 working class men could ever earn in a lifetime.

To cap that he has now organised his affairs through a series of complex secret company setups to avoid paying tax on said wealth.

That is Labour socialism at its best.

Cllr Terry Kelly said...

Have I said something illegal; committed a crime; are you dreaming again about living under your beloved 3Rd. Reich?

Im' talking about the Stalin who saved the world from Nazism, who provided the freedome that we all enjoy; Russian bloke; big moustache; was in all the papers at the time; uncle Joe to everyone in Britain as we knitted socks for his beloved and heroic soldiers.

Who are you talking about?

Cllr Terry Kelly said...

(Ryan Connolly) 14:56

I know you must be hurting as you look at the latest capitalist shambles; look at the world’s richest capitalist country America; tented cities everywhere full of unemployed people who have had their homes repossessed.

The Capitalist American dream where there are more people in prison than any country in the world; look and weep; your vicious degrading system isn’t working; after centuries of it we know it can’t work and what do you come up with “Tony Blair” pathetic; is this really the best you can do?

Craig said...

Hi Mr Kelly,

Stalin was Georgian, not Russian, I just thought I would let you know. And he was responsible for the deaths of millions of Soviet citizens prior to World war 2. And I seem to recall the Nazi/Soviet pact, where Stalin sided with the Nazis and carved up Poland. Then there was the Katyn massacre; oh and the ethnic cleansing of East Prussia. Nice hero for you to have. Yes, the Soviets were responsible for defeating the Nazis in large part, and we should be grateful for their sacrifices, but we shouldn't forget that Stalin was an incredibly evil man.

And Mr Kelly; you cannot be a socialist, because you are a member of the Labour Party; Labour are not a socialist party. So what are you? A reactionary? A professional politician?

I'm a socialist, with socialist values. But I am not and never will be a Labour Party supporter. I care to much for the wellbeing of others to do that. So Mr Kelly; once again I ask you; what are you? Because you are not and never will be a socialist!

Cllr Terry Kelly said...

(Craig) 18:18

I already have a mental picture of you; the Trotsky beard and glasses; lots of wee badges sticking to your working man’s jacket with your working man’s boots on while never having done a day’s work in your life.

Forever the oppositionist knowing that that means you can always claim to be pure; never actually having done anything political except talk; a saloon bar revolutionary with a great line in cod socialist jargon; you will never make an ounce of political difference because you are too scared to really get involved and much too fond of posing.

You forgot to mention that it was Stalin who killed Bambi’s mother; check your CIA sources and they will confirm this for you.